
PROPOSALSMay 7, 202608:41
Three Proposal Red Flags That Tell Contracting Officers You Used AI to Write It
Featured guest
Zack Golden
Zack Golden joined Eric Coffie on this episode.
About this episode
Government proposal writing mistakes are costing small businesses millions in contracts they should be winning — and most don't even know they're making them. In this episode, procurement expert Zack Golden breaks down the three most common red flags that tell a contracting officer your proposal was AI-generated, generic, or just not written by a real person who wants the work. If you've submitted technically compliant proposals and still lost, this episode explains exactly why.
What you'll learn in this episode: Why AI-generated proposals are getting flagged immediately — Bold fonts, bullet points everywhere, and em-dashes are dead giveaways that your bid wasn't written by a human, and evaluators notice before they even finish page one. The "contractor shall" trap and how it kills best-value bids — Simply restating what the SOW requires doesn't tell the agency why you're the right partner; Zang explains the critical difference between technical compliance and compelling narrative.
Show notes & timestamps
- 0:00Welcome to the Federal Help Center podcast intro
- 0:27Zack Golden introduces himself and his procurement background
- 1:03Why proposal volume has surged and geographic limits are gone
- 1:32What contracting officers are seeing in bid quality right now
- 2:55Overview of the three biggest proposal red flags today
- 3:53Red flag one: the cut-and-paste AI proposal giveaway
- 4:51Red flag two: parroting the SOW without narrative or intent
- 6:20Real example of a winning proposal under 20 pages
- 7:19Red flag three: no person behind the business or the bid
- 8:17Closing and community call to action Market Intelligence gives you the federal opportunities, agency signals, recompete intel, and pursuit briefs that tell you not just what contracts exist, but which ones to chase and how to win them.


